Investigative Report
Concerns Regarding “Share The Winnings” Lotto Club and Associated Business Practices
Prepared from the perspective of an independent consumer investigator and participant
Overview
This report documents my personal experience as a paying member of an online lottery-style matrix program known as “Share The Winnings”, and outlines a series of events that raise concerns regarding transparency, member treatment, and business practices following a change in ownership.
This report is presented for informational and consumer-awareness purposes only. All statements herein are either:
1) Based on my direct, first-hand experience, or
2) Derived from publicly available materials, communications, and representations, which I have retained where applicable.
Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and draw their own conclusions.
Background: The “Share The Winnings” Program
“Share The Winnings” was originally operated by Jeremy Duncan and structured as a 3×10 matrix-based lottery club. Members paid recurring $60 monthly fees and worked to establish and maintain positions within the matrix.
At the time relevant to this report:
1) My membership was active and in good standing
2) I held a top-tier matrix position (3rd leg, top right position direct to the company)
3) That position required time, participation, and financial commitment to achieve
Change of Ownership and Lack of Disclosure
At some point, the business was sold or transferred to new ownership.
Based on a subsequently released video and other communications, the new owners were identified as:
1) Jack Fallon
2) Jeffrey Michael Breakey
Prior to the release of that video:
1) I received no direct notice of the sale
2) I was not contacted to confirm whether I wished to remain a paying member
3) No explanation of how existing matrix positions would be handled was provided
Account Access Terminated Without Notice
Following the ownership change:
1) I was unable to access my back office
2) No termination notice, refund, or explanation was provided
3) My membership had not expired or lapsed
I contacted Jeremy Duncan, the previous owner, who indicated he would reach out to the system programmer to resolve the issue. No follow-up occurred, and I received no response from the programmer despite multiple attempts.
At no point did the new owners contact me directly regarding:
1) Account status
2) Continuation of membership
3) Reinstatement options
4) Transfer of matrix placement
Disclosure via “Special Video”
Weeks later, a recorded video was released identifying the new owners and discussing the transition. This was the first time I became aware of who had acquired the company.
The video characterized the transition as transparent and ethical; however, this conflicted with my experience, as I—and other members I spoke with—had already lost access without notice or explanation.
I retained a copy of this video for documentation purposes.
Subsequent Developments
Several months later:
1) Jeremy Duncan reportedly regained control of the company
2) The compensation plan was changed to a 3×5 matrix
3) I requested reinstatement to my prior position or an equivalent placement
Despite earlier representations that my team would be placed beneath me, no corrective action occurred, and communication again ceased.
Additional Consumer Concerns
(Separate Business Activities)
During my research, I also reviewed business activities associated with Jeffrey Michael Breakey, including a direct mail and lead-generation business known as Direct Mail Essentials (DME).
Public representations associated with that business include:
1) Discounted postage products
2) Lead guarantees (“Nixie guarantees”)
Important clarification:
I am not asserting criminal activity. However, I believe certain claims and practices raise reasonable consumer-protection questions, particularly regarding:
1) The legality of deeply discounted postage products
2) Inconsistencies in written guarantees
3) Risk exposure to customers if representations are inaccurate
Consumers should independently verify:
1) Compliance with USPS regulations
2) The nature and source of any discounted postage
3) Refund or replacement policies in writing
Why This Report Matters
This report is not written out of malice or retaliation.
It is written because:
1) Members lost positions without notice
2) Ownership changes occurred without adequate disclosure
3) Communication ceased when legitimate questions were raised
4) Representations made publicly did not align with my documented experience
Programs involving matrix structures, recurring fees, or lottery-style participation require exceptional transparency, especially during ownership transitions.
Conclusion and Consumer Advisory
Based on my experience, I recommend that anyone considering involvement with:
1) “Share The Winnings”
2) Successor or related programs
3) Any associated direct-mail or lead-generation offers
…proceed with heightened caution, obtain written confirmations, and retain independent documentation of all agreements.
If you believe you have been financially harmed, consider reporting your experience to:
1) Your state Attorney General
2) Consumer protection agencies
3) Appropriate regulatory bodies
Final Note
This report reflects my experience and observations. Others may have had different outcomes. Transparency, communication, and fair treatment of members are foundational to trust in any business model. When those elements break down, scrutiny is warranted.
Stay informed.
Document everything.
Protect your interests.
Below is the additional information in image, text, and video. Yes, I do vent a bit in all my research results, and it is my free speech to do so, and I do this in hopes to bring these people to light, and so you know not to deal with them in the future...
Explanation of getting screwed out of my Share The Winnings Matrix Position.
Click HERE to Download
Share The Winnings presentation.
Click HERE to Download
Video about New Owners & Ownership
Click HERE to Download